Posts in ‘Environment’

Let’s kill the Carbon Pollution Reinforcement Subsidy

Thursday, February 19th, 2009

Beware the policy that has no opponents in high places. During the US elections it was a reality check when the financial crisis came to a boil, and instantly both parties were in complete agreement about the need for a bail out. Much less being said about the redesign of the system to deter future […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Ronda Jambe at 9:02 am | Comments (8) |
Filed under: Environment

Government takes a second look at emissions trading

Friday, February 13th, 2009

(Cross posted from What the people want) The federal government appears to have been reading our research, or similar, on an emissions trading scheme. According to The Australian Online TREASURER Wayne Swan has asked a powerful House economics committee to judge whether the proposed emissions trading scheme is the best way to tackle climate change… […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Graham at 5:22 am | Comments (1) |
Filed under: Environment

Another reason for winds to head south?

Thursday, February 12th, 2009

A few days ago I drew attention to work that suggested the Indian Ocean Dipole was responsible for causing drought in southern Australia . I contrasted that to a view from the Bureau of Meteorology that the change was caused by the hole in the ozone layer over the South Pole. Now there is an […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Graham at 10:13 am | Comments (4) |
Filed under: Environment

Irish joke?

Wednesday, February 11th, 2009

The Northern Irish Environment Minister, Sammy Wilson, “has banned government television adverts in Northern Ireland warning of the effects of climate change“. This might seem a little “Irish” on a couple of fronts. For it to make sense you have to realise that England has devolved power to Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales, so as […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Graham at 6:19 am | Comments (12) |
Filed under: Environment

Drought, but no mention of global warming

Thursday, February 5th, 2009

Scientists from UNSW, UTAS and CSIRO think they know what is causing the drought across Australia. Not global warming, or at least it doesn’t get a run in the news report, but the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD). I don’t think this is actually new news, but the scientists are to be published in a peer […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Graham at 9:11 pm | Comments (4) |
Filed under: Environment

Treasury ETS modelling fails peer review

Wednesday, February 4th, 2009

There’s a certain line of argument in the greenhouse debate that says only those documents that have been peer-reviewed are worth anything. It’s a strange line of argument. I have a vision of a queue of facts all in a quantum state, waiting for a bureaucratic process to either confirm or anihilate them. Facts aren’t […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Graham at 11:45 am | Comments Off on Treasury ETS modelling fails peer review |
Filed under: Environment

ETS another sub-prime?

Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009

At one stage I thought that an emissions trading scheme was probably the best way of moving away from a carbon economy, but the real world says it isn’t. Federal parliament today sits for the first time this year and one of the issues on the notice paper will be a bill aimed to establish […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Graham at 7:55 am | Comments (2) |
Filed under: Environment

And the beat goes on…..

Wednesday, January 28th, 2009

It was stinking hot in Canberra, but I couldn’t very well use the heat as an excuse not to attend the Climate Action Summit, could I? I slid into my seat in the packed ANU auditorium as Clive Hamilton delivered some political truths, all bad news. That much I already knew, as he outlined the […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Ronda Jambe at 1:14 pm | Comments Off on And the beat goes on….. |
Filed under: Environment

‘Moving Forward’ – a slogan or a lie?

Monday, January 12th, 2009

My partner alerted me to this phrase. Listen for it, coming from the mouths of policy advisors or pollies. It used to imply a plan, but now it just seems to cover a vague idea of the future. We can’t do otherwise, can we? Except, of course, if moving forward is taking us backwards, into […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Ronda Jambe at 9:11 am | Comments (1) |
Filed under: Environment

Rudd’s 39% by 2020 CO2 reduction – boiling the frog slowly

Wednesday, December 17th, 2008

Kevin Rudd’s ETS plan or “Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme” as it is officially called, is a radical plan which starts off cool but in 12 years’ time will end up boiling hot. It’s not a 5 to 15% reduction in CO2, but a whopping 29 to 39%. The only sensible way to measure increases or […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Graham at 6:51 am | Comments (3) |
Filed under: Environment