June 05, 2013 | Graham

Me and asbestos



Even the risk to workers in the NBN asbestos events would seem to me to be over-stated, let alone that to residents. Asbestos is a dangerous product, but huge numbers of us have experienced significant exposure to it without developing any signs of asbestosis.

In the 60s and 70s I was Dad’s labourer as he renovated various beach cottages that we owned. This was an environment where cheap materials were used, and preferably those that could withstand prolonged exposure to the elements, particularly salt spray.

“Fibro” or asbestos fibreboard as it is generically known, was the material of choice, not just for external and internal cladding of walls, but for roofs as well. Particularly roofs, as they regularly rusted away under the ministrations of the coastal gales.

At first we used to cut the boards using specially designed cutters which cut by punching thin sticks of asbestos out from between the two parts of the sheet you wanted to separate. These made great play swords until they broke.

But sometime in the 70s someone invented a circular saw blade that would cut asbestos. Dad loved this invention. It was a spectacular process where a tornado of asbestos dust billowed out from the saw and distributed a thin sheet of dust over everything.

I can still remember the effect it made lying over the hairs of my arm. Unlike normal dirt it tended to cling.

By now you are probably getting the impression that I had a fair bit of exposure to asbestos, and you would be right. Dad had even more. Not only was he the principal artisan, but in his day job as a marine engineer he was also exposed to asbestos in the lagging that was used around piping in ships (the cause of death of some sailors).

Yet, when Dad died aged 93 there was no sign of exposure. Last time someone had cause to look at my lungs there was no sign either, and modesty forbids me from boasting how well they work in the gym.

Apparently 600 or so of us die from asbestosis each year. That sounds like a large number, but it is actually around the same level as the Queensland annual road toll.

Given that my experience was certainly not unique, that means that the residents exposed to the current NBN misadventures in asbestos are highly unlikely to suffer any ill effects at all. It is probably much more dangerous for them to hop into their car and drive to the next suburb.



Posted by Graham at 7:34 am | Comments (7) |
Filed under: Uncategorized

June 03, 2013 | Graham

Another explanation of the temperature plateau?



A new paper, lead authored by Australian Randall Donohue of CSIRO, could provide a new clue as to why global temperatures have stood still for almost a decade and a half.

The paper finds that there was a more or less straight line relationship between the 14% increase in CO2 in the atmosphere between 1982 and 2010 and the increase in foliage of 11% due to the CO2 fertilisation effect.

This ought to surprise no-one, but it does give an insight into negative feedbacks to CO2 induced warming.

Most of the really hot weather that we experience is driven by desert and grasslands. On the east coast of Australia that means that the summer winds that come west over the inland plains can produce temperatures in the 40s, while the easterlies and south-easterlies from the ocean don’t produce anything much over 30.

Now, if the area of desert is shrinking, then the heating effect has to be modified, and the paper does note that woody weeds (aka trees) are tending to invade and supplant the grasslands.

That means more shade, and more uptake of energy to build and maintain trees, leading to less energy being released back into the atmosphere for warming.

And there could be another negative effect on temperature. A paper by Sheil and Murdayarso hypothesises that forests create rain by effecting atmospheric circulation. While I’m not endorsing this claim, if it is true, then greater forestation equals higher rainfall, which also equals lower temperature, and faster vegetation growth.

This is all pretty significant stuff, and it makes you wonder why, when I search Google News using Randall Donohue’s name, not one result was from an Australian media organisation.

Indeed, there seems to be more excitement in Tehran than Canberra.



Posted by Graham at 1:02 pm | Comments (12) |
Filed under: Uncategorized

June 03, 2013 | Graham

Swan in kamikaze dive into Republican ditch?



Someone, I don’t remember who, said that Joh Bjelke-Petersen was behaving like a Victa Lawnmower just before the end because “they always speed up before they run out of gas”.

So, if you don’t like the idea of a kamikaze swan, you can opt for the victa lawnmower.

Because nothing other than malignant hyperactivity could possibly explain why Wayne Swan would have decided to raise the issue of a republic right at this moment.

You can’t blame Malcolm Turnbull for helping him along.

Here is a government that is going to lose an election by a larger margin than any other, possibly since federation, because it is perceived to be flaky and incapable of following-through and completing any task – the political equivalent of ADHD.

The most recent evidence of this is “Pink Batts Mark II” probably soon to be known as “Asbestos Gate” where the incompetence of Telstra contractors working on a project related to the NBN have subjected people in Labor’s former heartland, western Sydney, to a small increase in mortality by unnecessarily exposing them to asbestos.

This will just add to their disenchantment with Labor, as that other western Sydney barbeque stopper – illegal immigration – continues to accelerate apace.

And what does the Treasurer inject into this cauldron of discontent? He decides to  “ramp up his calls for a republic, demanding the Labor Party enact its policy starting the process of constitutional change “sooner rather than later”.

To add insult to injury, Queensland, his home state, where he has already lost his seat once (in 1996) was one of the states that voted most heavily against the Republic referendum. Opposition was wide spread, including in his own seat of Lilley.

Perhaps Swan thinks this is some sort of a diversion. In fact it is confirmation that this government, and its key members, are completely out of touch with what the public wants.

Update:

I just heard Wayne Swan saying words to the effect that Australia is the 12th richest economy in the world, and people must be laughing at us because we don’t have an Australian head of state.

In western Sydney the response is likely to be “I don’t know about that mate, but if we’re a republic does that mean we’re going to be able to police our borders better?”

Out there, they’re not so worried about whether we have an Australian head of state or not, but where the rest of us come from. It may be paranoia, or it may be xenophobia, but they all get a vote.



Posted by Graham at 8:39 am | Comments (4) |
Filed under: Australian Politics
« Newer Posts