Posts in ‘International Politics’

Original sin and Abu Ghraib.

Wednesday, August 25th, 2004

Two of my recent themes collided with each other on Stephen Crittendon’s Religion Report this morning, and also with the release of the US Army report into Abu Ghraib prison. On the OnLineOpinions list I have recently been arguing that you cannot understand classical liberalism outside of the context of original sin. In a couple […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Graham at 11:51 pm | Comments Off on Original sin and Abu Ghraib. |

Winning the peace isn’t just a problem for Rumsfeld

Thursday, August 19th, 2004

Winning the peace in Iraq isn’t just a US problem, it is a problem for all of us. If it is lost, then we in Australia should share some of the blame, and the press more than most. How do I expect the press to play a role in winning the peace and why should they?

Continue Reading...
Posted by Graham at 9:51 pm | Comments Off on Winning the peace isn’t just a problem for Rumsfeld |

Readers review Moore – Part II.

Tuesday, August 17th, 2004

The following post is from Stewart Mills. To understand F 9/11 you need to understand satire The other night I saw Fahrenheit 9/11. It gave me a clear image of the self-interest that is determining the course of US and global events. It made my blood boil. How could Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheyney get away […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Graham at 9:19 pm | Comments Off on Readers review Moore – Part II. |

Readers review Moore – Part I.

Monday, August 16th, 2004

I mightn’t like Michael Moore’s films, but millions do, and many of them read On Line Opinion. In response to our invitation to send in reviews of Fahrenheit 9/11 we had 8 responses. Two longer ones and 6 shorter. So I’m going to publish them in three posts. A summary of the shorter ones tonight, […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Graham at 10:16 pm | Comments Off on Readers review Moore – Part I. |

More on Empire

Wednesday, July 7th, 2004

Well if Graham and I were not having an argument about American imperialism, then we are having one now. I say America is an imperial power and he says it is not. Let us go through the arguments in some detail. To start with I take a position that empires and imperialism are bad. I […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Unknown at 6:15 pm | Comments (4) |

An empire in the mind

Monday, July 5th, 2004

Gary says that he and I are having an argument about the word “empire”. I’m not sure that either of us has directly used the word in debate against the other, but I take it as being encapsulated in the word “imperialism”. Gary appears to think that the US is acting in Iraq to extend […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Graham at 10:57 pm | Comments Off on An empire in the mind |

On Empire – something to read and ponder over

Wednesday, June 30th, 2004

Graham and I are having something of a dispute over the word Empire. I have pointed out that I am not alone in using the term to describe current American policy. Scholars of all political hues have employed the expression. Among the most distinguished is Rashid Khalidi who is Edward Said Professor of Arab Studies […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Unknown at 8:46 pm | Comments (1) |

Replying to Graham on Iraq – long

Wednesday, June 30th, 2004

Gary, You say “However I will not from behind my lap top lecture those who seek to resist violence with violence,” but that is in fact what you are doing. The US, British and Australians resist violence with violence and you condemn them, even though this is done more closely in accordance with the laws […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Unknown at 5:33 pm | Comments (3) |

Iraq – the end of the beginning.

Tuesday, June 29th, 2004

Some of the critical commentary on the war in Iraq seems to show the same lack of concern for human life that the accusers level at “warmongers” such as George Bush, Tony Blair and John Howard. The AFR’s Geoffrey Barker described as hardline Howard’s June 4 speech to the Washington Press Club, where Howard said […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Graham at 4:07 pm | Comments (6) |

Repaying the servants of Empire

Monday, May 17th, 2004

Mistah Kurtz – he dead I was greatly heartened lately to hear that the neo-cons at the Pentagon had arranged a showing of Pontecorvo’s the Battle of Algiers, before launching their current “war on terror”. (The latter phrase is a classical piece of Orwellian New Speak and can be roughly translated to mean “Bombing and […]

Continue Reading...
Posted by Unknown at 6:12 pm | Comments Off on Repaying the servants of Empire |