<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boticelli&#8217;s not a pornographer, so why is Henson?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ambitgambit.com/2008/05/29/boticellis-not-a-pornographer-so-why-is-henson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ambitgambit.com/2008/05/29/boticellis-not-a-pornographer-so-why-is-henson/</link>
	<description>Ambit Gambit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:31:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gibo</title>
		<link>http://www.ambitgambit.com/2008/05/29/boticellis-not-a-pornographer-so-why-is-henson/comment-page-1/#comment-2441</link>
		<dc:creator>gibo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 12:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/ambit/?p=3116#comment-2441</guid>
		<description>Its the way the photographs were done that sold me that its paedophilic (is there such a word?).
One of the photos of a young girl showed a look on her face that said, &quot;Im going to be raped, someone please help&quot;.
Who knows the artist much at a personal level. He has a history of portaying the girls as sexual victims. Maybe there have been many complaints to police about him over many years. Maybe cops know more about him than the media can print. Its a bad age for innocence. If he gets a sentence of some kind it would be better for the children of the world of tomorrow. Thats me of course:)
I think Gods Word also supports the chidren and not the hungry, lustful artist. Why dont they just photograph life without the sex bit that stirs immoral juices? Anything for fame is a poor master.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its the way the photographs were done that sold me that its paedophilic (is there such a word?).<br />
One of the photos of a young girl showed a look on her face that said, &#8220;Im going to be raped, someone please help&#8221;.<br />
Who knows the artist much at a personal level. He has a history of portaying the girls as sexual victims. Maybe there have been many complaints to police about him over many years. Maybe cops know more about him than the media can print. Its a bad age for innocence. If he gets a sentence of some kind it would be better for the children of the world of tomorrow. Thats me of course:)<br />
I think Gods Word also supports the chidren and not the hungry, lustful artist. Why dont they just photograph life without the sex bit that stirs immoral juices? Anything for fame is a poor master.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.ambitgambit.com/2008/05/29/boticellis-not-a-pornographer-so-why-is-henson/comment-page-1/#comment-2442</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 06:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/ambit/?p=3116#comment-2442</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s quite strange indeed. I presume (or at least hope) this whole silly saga will end up with the charges being dropped.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s quite strange indeed. I presume (or at least hope) this whole silly saga will end up with the charges being dropped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

