Comments on: Rudd gets serious about PM’s position

By: paul Robinson

paul Robinson — Tue, 29 May 2007 17:37:21 +0000

Given that Labour have never supported the policy of outsourcing job placements, (and are likely to bring it back into govt) it seems like a shrewd business move for TR to sell out of the Australian business now before it becomes devalued

By: Karooson

Karooson — Tue, 29 May 2007 10:29:03 +0000

Domestic issues,and the ability to be Prime minister of Australia,are not bed partners.Kevin Rudd is going to change the political face of Australia,from a sectarian and divided country into a country that we can call a Fairdinkum Australia,which it is not now,under the ruling party,the Lib/Nat disorganised and rightwing

By: Bob Buick

Bob Buick — Tue, 29 May 2007 06:52:15 +0000

The ABC RN had a segment on TR and the Australian business was lagging behind the European divisions in profitability … if she sells it will be of little loss if it enhances KR’s superannuation and benefits.

By: Terje Petersen

Terje Petersen — Mon, 28 May 2007 09:10:07 +0000

I think this would have and should have remained largely irrelevant except for the fact that the ALP was conducting a witch hunt against other employers. People routinely have conflicts of interest and it is how they handle those conflicts that should matter not merely the fact that they exist. I certainly don’t think the “greed” claim has much merit. Of course what makes PR sense is perhaps a different matter.