<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vic Liberals make correct call on Green preferences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ambitgambit.com/2006/11/20/vic-liberals-make-correct-call-on-green-preferences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ambitgambit.com/2006/11/20/vic-liberals-make-correct-call-on-green-preferences/</link>
	<description>Ambit Gambit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:31:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Elder</title>
		<link>http://www.ambitgambit.com/2006/11/20/vic-liberals-make-correct-call-on-green-preferences/comment-page-1/#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Elder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/ambit/?p=1744#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>The other issue, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://andrewelder.blogspot.com/2006/11/preference-for-bloody-mindedness-there.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I&#039;ve said elsewhere&lt;/a&gt;, is that a major party on the ropes is vulnerable not just to the predations of its major-party opponents but to smaller, but no less incapacitating, opponents in its home constituency.
A losing major party thinks it has to choose between consolidating its base and reaching out to the uncommitted, and is buffetted by activists convincved that it&#039;s either one or the other. That party becomes a winning party only once it realises that it&#039;s a matter of both/and, bringing its opponents down by not only taking seats from them but doing smart deals with those who operate where the other major party can&#039;t reach (e.g. Labor helping rural independents in Tamworth, Liberals helping the Greens in inner-city Melbourne).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other issue, as <a href="http://andrewelder.blogspot.com/2006/11/preference-for-bloody-mindedness-there.html" rel="nofollow">I&#8217;ve said elsewhere</a>, is that a major party on the ropes is vulnerable not just to the predations of its major-party opponents but to smaller, but no less incapacitating, opponents in its home constituency.<br />
A losing major party thinks it has to choose between consolidating its base and reaching out to the uncommitted, and is buffetted by activists convincved that it&#8217;s either one or the other. That party becomes a winning party only once it realises that it&#8217;s a matter of both/and, bringing its opponents down by not only taking seats from them but doing smart deals with those who operate where the other major party can&#8217;t reach (e.g. Labor helping rural independents in Tamworth, Liberals helping the Greens in inner-city Melbourne).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vivy</title>
		<link>http://www.ambitgambit.com/2006/11/20/vic-liberals-make-correct-call-on-green-preferences/comment-page-1/#comment-1428</link>
		<dc:creator>vivy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/ambit/?p=1744#comment-1428</guid>
		<description>Yes well, those that can afford, care about those who can&#039;t.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes well, those that can afford, care about those who can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

