<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anthropophagai anyone?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ambitgambit.com/2005/05/08/anthropophagai-anyone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ambitgambit.com/2005/05/08/anthropophagai-anyone/</link>
	<description>Ambit Gambit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:01:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Young</title>
		<link>http://www.ambitgambit.com/2005/05/08/anthropophagai-anyone/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 15:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/ambit/?p=593#comment-721</guid>
		<description>The ABC story is interesting, although a little hyped.  For example: &quot;There are warnings of a new El Nino and the latest drought statement released by the Bureau of Meteorology shows the last three months were the warmest ever.&quot;  Ever?  I think they mean since they first started taking records. At least they don&#039;t invoke global warming, which is my beef with the Breakfast story.
As far as I understand dimming it&#039;s an issue no matter where you are on the globe - it doesn&#039;t just affect polluted areas.  It is also a similar effect in some respects to what you get from water vapour.  Which may provide a clue as to why we&#039;ve had such a hot summer, without having to invoke greenhouse to explain it (I don&#039;t deny the greenhouse effect by the way, I&#039;m just sceptical of some of the claims).
I&#039;ve noticed that the temperature has been hotter.  I&#039;ve also noticed that the spread between maxima and minima over the course of a day has tended to be larger than the standard 10 degrees that we normally get.  This would be consistent with there being less cloud cover.  Clouds tend to reflect sunlight upwards, similarly to global dimming, making maxima less pronounced, and they tend to reflect heat downwards, making minima higher.
My understanding of the reason for there being less rain is that it is related to El Nino, which is not affected, as far as I am aware, by greenhouse.  So, assuming the above is correct, then our hotter temperatures are likely to be related to El Nino rather than greenhouse, adn so offer no support to the Kiribati story.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ABC story is interesting, although a little hyped.  For example: &#8220;There are warnings of a new El Nino and the latest drought statement released by the Bureau of Meteorology shows the last three months were the warmest ever.&#8221;  Ever?  I think they mean since they first started taking records. At least they don&#8217;t invoke global warming, which is my beef with the Breakfast story.<br />
As far as I understand dimming it&#8217;s an issue no matter where you are on the globe &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t just affect polluted areas.  It is also a similar effect in some respects to what you get from water vapour.  Which may provide a clue as to why we&#8217;ve had such a hot summer, without having to invoke greenhouse to explain it (I don&#8217;t deny the greenhouse effect by the way, I&#8217;m just sceptical of some of the claims).<br />
I&#8217;ve noticed that the temperature has been hotter.  I&#8217;ve also noticed that the spread between maxima and minima over the course of a day has tended to be larger than the standard 10 degrees that we normally get.  This would be consistent with there being less cloud cover.  Clouds tend to reflect sunlight upwards, similarly to global dimming, making maxima less pronounced, and they tend to reflect heat downwards, making minima higher.<br />
My understanding of the reason for there being less rain is that it is related to El Nino, which is not affected, as far as I am aware, by greenhouse.  So, assuming the above is correct, then our hotter temperatures are likely to be related to El Nino rather than greenhouse, adn so offer no support to the Kiribati story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin Mullane</title>
		<link>http://www.ambitgambit.com/2005/05/08/anthropophagai-anyone/comment-page-1/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin Mullane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 14:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/ambit/?p=593#comment-722</guid>
		<description>Graham, you might want to check out this story (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/indepth/featureitems/s1359396.htm)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.abc.net.au/news/indepth/featureitems/s1359396.htm)&lt;/a&gt; in regards to the 1.1 degree increase in temperature across Australia.
Although I agree with your conclusion that an eleven year record tide is no reason to ring alarm bells, please don&#039;t discredit this story without looking at the broader picture.
As the recent Four Corners program (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2005/s1325819.htm)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2005/s1325819.htm)&lt;/a&gt; highlighted ... global warming is still a major issue, and one that seems to be severely underestimated - due, in part, to the counter effects of global dimming!
If an isolated island like Kiribati, without a pollution problem such as we have in the western world, is not &#039;protected&#039; by global dimming, it is conceivable that their average temperature may have exceeded Australia&#039;s record hike.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graham, you might want to check out this story (<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/indepth/featureitems/s1359396.htm)" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/indepth/featureitems/s1359396.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.abc.net.au/news/indepth/featureitems/s1359396.htm</a>) in regards to the 1.1 degree increase in temperature across Australia.<br />
Although I agree with your conclusion that an eleven year record tide is no reason to ring alarm bells, please don&#8217;t discredit this story without looking at the broader picture.<br />
As the recent Four Corners program (<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2005/s1325819.htm)" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2005/s1325819.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2005/s1325819.htm</a>) highlighted &#8230; global warming is still a major issue, and one that seems to be severely underestimated &#8211; due, in part, to the counter effects of global dimming!<br />
If an isolated island like Kiribati, without a pollution problem such as we have in the western world, is not &#8216;protected&#8217; by global dimming, it is conceivable that their average temperature may have exceeded Australia&#8217;s record hike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

