<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old-Growth Forests Re-Run</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ambitgambit.com/2004/02/17/old-growth-forests-re-run/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ambitgambit.com/2004/02/17/old-growth-forests-re-run/</link>
	<description>Ambit Gambit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:01:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.ambitgambit.com/2004/02/17/old-growth-forests-re-run/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/ambit/?p=178#comment-144</guid>
		<description>You mean give Tony Abbot Wilson Tuckey&#039;s job?
Certainly everyone is holding their breath over what economics graduate Latham will do about this iconic Green isue.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean give Tony Abbot Wilson Tuckey&#8217;s job?<br />
Certainly everyone is holding their breath over what economics graduate Latham will do about this iconic Green isue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.ambitgambit.com/2004/02/17/old-growth-forests-re-run/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2004 13:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/ambit/?p=178#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Peter wrote:
&quot;I suspect that, mindful of how much the Tasmanian dams issue helped Bob Hawke to government in 1983, he will take a position that is relatively pro-Green. &quot;
Interestingly enough, wouldn&#039;t it be equally likely that Howard will move first to exploit the wedgie possibility in the ALP&#039;s stance?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter wrote:<br />
&#8220;I suspect that, mindful of how much the Tasmanian dams issue helped Bob Hawke to government in 1983, he will take a position that is relatively pro-Green. &#8221;<br />
Interestingly enough, wouldn&#8217;t it be equally likely that Howard will move first to exploit the wedgie possibility in the ALP&#8217;s stance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

